<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cushie 12-Step Program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cushie.info/blog/2009/12/20/cushie-12-step-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cushie.info/blog/2009/12/20/cushie-12-step-program/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s About Time There Was Support for Cushing&#039;s</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:29:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nazli H. Rizk</title>
		<link>http://www.cushie.info/blog/2009/12/20/cushie-12-step-program/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Nazli H. Rizk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cushie.info/blog/?p=105#comment-100</guid>
		<description>I thought I was doing ok in general after 35 years post left adrenalectomy for Cushing&#039;s Syndrome and no replacement prednisolone for 34 years. But for a month now have felt very unwell &amp; yesterday  test results showed double the normal amount of am cortisol, normal pm cortisol &amp; normal 24 hour urinary cortisol.Am trying to find a doctor here, but wonder if anyone has some experience or insight into this? Thanks for any help. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I was doing ok in general after 35 years post left adrenalectomy for Cushing&#039;s Syndrome and no replacement prednisolone for 34 years. But for a month now have felt very unwell &amp; yesterday  test results showed double the normal amount of am cortisol, normal pm cortisol &amp; normal 24 hour urinary cortisol.Am trying to find a doctor here, but wonder if anyone has some experience or insight into this? Thanks for any help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Cushie 12-Step Program : Cushie Info -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.cushie.info/blog/2009/12/20/cushie-12-step-program/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Cushie 12-Step Program : Cushie Info -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 17:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cushie.info/blog/?p=105#comment-54</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Robin and MaryO, Diana P. Lead. Diana P. Lead said: RT @cushings: RT @tweetmeme Cushie 12-Step Program http://bit.ly/6SaMyR [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Robin and MaryO, Diana P. Lead. Diana P. Lead said: RT @cushings: RT @tweetmeme Cushie 12-Step Program <a href="http://bit.ly/6SaMyR" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6SaMyR</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-Patient Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.cushie.info/blog/2009/12/20/cushie-12-step-program/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>e-Patient Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cushie.info/blog/?p=105#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Hahaha :).... to me all this comes down to a search for *useful, reliable* information. And Google&#039;s &quot;figure out what to show at the top&quot; algorithms are in no way designed to root out the best health info. 
 
So although Google&#039;s a great tool for things like &quot;buy DVD player&quot; it&#039;s a mistake to think it&#039;s therefore good for everything.  It just doesn&#039;t have the logic to handle medical topics in any way other than &quot;what are OTHER people saying about it?&quot; 
 
Specifically, Google&#039;s main tool for ranking a page is to assess how many other pages link to it, and how good *those* pages are. Wikipedia has a good diagram of how it works: &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pagerank.&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pagerank.&lt;/a&gt;  
 
Maybe someday there will be a &quot;google health search&quot; optimized by patient wisdom, but until that day, do as this post says and go directly to good patient communities! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha <img src='http://www.cushie.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8230;. to me all this comes down to a search for *useful, reliable* information. And Google&#039;s &quot;figure out what to show at the top&quot; algorithms are in no way designed to root out the best health info. </p>
<p>So although Google&#039;s a great tool for things like &quot;buy DVD player&quot; it&#039;s a mistake to think it&#039;s therefore good for everything.  It just doesn&#039;t have the logic to handle medical topics in any way other than &quot;what are OTHER people saying about it?&quot; </p>
<p>Specifically, Google&#039;s main tool for ranking a page is to assess how many other pages link to it, and how good *those* pages are. Wikipedia has a good diagram of how it works: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pagerank." target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pagerank.</a>  </p>
<p>Maybe someday there will be a &quot;google health search&quot; optimized by patient wisdom, but until that day, do as this post says and go directly to good patient communities!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

